The Aeta, Agta, or Dumagat, are collective terms for several Filipino indigenous peoples who live in various parts of the island of Luzon in the Philippines. They are considered to be part of the Negrito ethnic groups and share common physical characteristics of dark skin tones, short statures, curly to Afro-textured hair, and a higher frequency of naturally lighter hair colour (blondism) relative to the general population. They are thought to be among the earliest inhabitants of the Philippines, preceding the Austronesian migrations. Regardless, modern Aeta populations have significant Austronesian admixture and speak Austronesian languages.
Aeta (Ayta /ˈaɪtə/ EYE-tə), Agta and Dumagat, are collective terms for several indigenous peoples who live in various parts of Luzon island in the Philippines. They are included in the wider Negrito grouping of the Philippines and the rest of Southeast Asia, with whom they share superficial common physical characteristics such as: dark skin tones; short statures; frizzy to curly hair; and a higher frequency of naturally lighter hair colour (blondism) relative to the general population. They are thought to be among the earliest inhabitants of the Philippines—preceding the Austronesian migrations.[2][3] Regardless, the modern Aeta populations have significant Austronesian admixture, and speak Austronesian languages.[4]
| |
---|---|
Total population | |
50,236[1] | |
Regions with significant populations | |
Philippines | |
Languages | |
Philippine Negrito languages, Kapampangan, Ilocano, Filipino, English | |
Religion | |
Christianity, Anito, folk religions | |
Related ethnic groups | |
Batak, Manobo, Mamanwa; other Negrito peoples |
Aeta communities were historically nomadic hunter-gatherers, typically consisting of approximately one to five families per mobile group.[5] Groups under the "Aeta" umbrella term are normally referred to after their geographic locations or their common languages.[6][7][8][9]
Etymology
The endonyms of most of the various Aeta peoples are derived from Proto-Malayo-Polynesian *ʔa(R)ta (also reconstructed as *qata or *ʔata) meaning "[dark skinned] person." This is in contrast to the other terms for "person" in other Philippine (and Oceanian) groups derived from Proto-Malayo-Polynesian *tau (e.g. Tagalog tao), which refers to lighter-skinned groups with majority Austronesian descent. Lawrence A. Reid wrote that *ʔa(R)ta may have originally been the Negrito word for "person" in Northern Luzon, but was adopted into Austronesian languages with the meaning of "dark-skinned person", after the arrival of Austronesian migrants to the Philippines from Taiwan. A common folk etymology is that the name "Aeta" is derived from itom or itim meaning, "black", but this is incorrect.[6][10]
The term "Dumagat" or "Dumaget" is an exonym meaning "[people] from Magat River." The Luzon Dumagats are not to be confused with the etymology of the Visayan Dumagat ("sea people", from the root word dagat - "sea") who dwell in the coastal areas of Mindanao, contrasting them from inland Lumad.[6]
Other exonyms of the Aeta are more derogatory. These include baluga ("half-breed") and pugot ("head-hunter").[6][11] The Aeta themselves call non-Negrito groups with various names that reflect their ancient relationships with Austronesians. These include names like ugsin, ugdin, ogden, or uldin ("red"); putî or pute ("white"); unat ("straight-haired"); or agani ("[rice] harvester").[6]
Definition
Aeta (also Ayta, Áitâ, Ita, Alta, Arta, Atta, or Agta) is a collective term. Although commonly thought of as a single group, it is in reality composed of several ethnic groups that share similar hunter-gatherer lifestyles and physical features. They are usually divided into three main groups: the Aeta from Central Luzon; the Agta of Southeastern Luzon; and the Dumagat (also spelled Dumaget) of Eastern Luzon. These divisions, however, are arbitrary, and the three names can be used interchangeably. They are also commonly confused with the Ati people of the Visayas Islands.[6][4][12]
The following is a list of ethnolinguistic groups usually considered to be Aeta, and the provinces they are from.[6][4][12]
- Aeta – Central Luzon
- Agta – Southeastern Luzon
- Alabat Agta (also Alabat Island Agta) – Quezon
- Agta Cimarron – Camarines Sur
- Manide (also Abiyan Agta or Camarines Norte Agta) – Camarines Norte, Quezon
- Rinconada Agta (also Iriga Agta) – Camarines Sur
- Tabangnon (also Partido Agta, Katabangan, Katubung, or Isarog Agta) – Sorsogon, Quezon, Camarines Sur
- Dumagat – Eastern Luzon[10]
- Alta
- Northern Alta – Aurora
- Southern Alta (also Kabulowan Alta or Edimala) – Quezon, Nueva Ecija
- Arta – Quirino
- Atta
- Faire-Rizal Atta – Cagayan province
- Pamplona Atta – Cagayan province
- Pudtol Atta – Cagayan province
- Casiguran Dumagat – Aurora
- Central Cagayan Dumagat – Cagayan
- Palanan Dumagat – Isabela
- Paranan Dumagat (or Pahanan Dumagat) – Isabela
- Disabungan Dumagat – Isabela
- Dupaningan Dumagat – Cagayan
- Madella Dumagat – Quirino
- Sinauna Tagalog (also Remontado Dumagat) – Rizal, Quezon
- Umiray Dumagat – Quezon, Aurora
History
Origins
The Aeta people in the Philippines are generally grouped together with the wider Negrito population cluster of Southeast Asia, such as the Semang on the Malay Peninsula, or the Andamanese people. The Philippine Negritos display relatively closer genetic affinity towards different Eastern Asian populations, prehistoric Hoabinhian samples, as well as to the Indigenous people of New Guinea and Aboriginal Australians, from which they diverged around c. 40,000 years ago. They also display an internal genetic substructure along a North to South cline, suggesting their ancestral population diverged into two subgroups after the initial peopling of the Philippines. Furthermore, they display high percentages of Denisovan gene flow.[14][15]
The Aeta are the descendants of the same early "East-Eurasian" meta-population, which also gave rise to modern East Asians and Australasians, among other populations of the Asia-Pacific region. The earliest modern human migrations into the Philippine islands were during the Paleolithic, around 40,000 years ago, followed by two other migration waves between 25,000 and 12,000 years ago, through the Sundaland land bridges that linked the islands with the Asian mainland. The latest migration wave is associated with the Austronesian peoples (c. 7,000 years ago) from Taiwan.[14][15][16] Philippine Negritos furthermore display craniometric and dental affinities (Sundadonty) with various southern East Asian and Japanese populations, suggesting deep ancestral ties.[17]
Many modern Aeta display significant Austronesian admixture (~10% to 30%) due to population contact and mixing after the arrival of Austronesians. The modern Aeta speak Austronesian languages, although with a high number of non-Austronesian vocabulary, and follow a syncretic cultural practices, incorporating many Austronesian elements into their traditional culture. Conversely, other Austronesian Filipino ethnic groups, not traditionally considered Negritos, also have Negrito admixture (~10 to 20%), highlighting mutual contact and influence. Aetas are most closely related to the Batak people of Palawan.[18][14]
A recent study in 2021 analyzing archaic ancestry in 118 Philippine ethnic groups discovered an independent admixture event into Philippine Negritos from Denisovans. The Ayta Magbukon in particular were found to possess the highest level of Denisovan ancestry in the world (between 3-9%), which is about ~30%–40% higher than the amount observed among Australo-Papuans, suggesting that distinct Islander Denisovan populations existed in the Philippines, which admixed with modern humans after their arrival. At the same time, Central Luzon Negritos such as the Ayta Magbukon and Ayta Ambala were also found to have the least amount of Austronesian-derived) ancestry of all sampled Philippine ethnic groups, at ~10%–20%.[3]
Colonial era contacts and responses
Unlike many other Filipino ethnic groups, the Aetas have shown resistance to change. Aetas had little interaction with the Spaniards as they remained in the mountains during the Spanish rule. Even the attempts of the Spaniards failed to settle them in reducciones or reservations all throughout Spanish rule.
According to Spanish observers like Miguel López de Legazpi, Negritos possessed iron tools and weapons. Their speed and accuracy with a bow and arrow were proverbial and they were fearsome warriors. Unwary travelers or field workers were often easy targets. Despite their martial prowess, however, the Aeta's small numbers, primitive economy and lack of organization often made them easy prey for better-organized groups. Zambals seeking people to enslave would often take advantage of their internal feuding. They were often enslaved and sold to Borneo and China, and, unlike the serf feudal system (alipin) imposed on other Filipinos, there was little chance of manumission.[19]
Demographics
In 2010, there were 50,236 Aeta people in the Philippines.[1]
Ancestral lands
Aetas are found in Zambales, Tarlac, Pampanga, Panay, Bataan, and Nueva Ecija, but were forced to move to resettlement areas in Pampanga and Tarlac following the devastating Mount Pinatubo eruption in June 1991.[20]
Some Aeta communities have received government land titles recognizing their claims to their ancestral lands.
A total of 454 Aeta families in Floridablanca, Pampanga, received their Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT) on May 27, 2009. The title covers about 7,440 hectares in San Marcelino and Brgy. Batiawan in Zambales and barangays Mawakat and Nabuklod in Floridablanca.[21] It was the first time clean ancestral domain titles were distributed by the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP).
A CADT was awarded to 1,501 Aeta families in Botolan, Zambales, on January 14, 2010. The area covers 15,860 hectares that include the four barangays of Villar, Burgos, Moraza and Belbel in Botolan, Zambales.[22][23]
The Aeta Abellen community of Sitio Maporac, Barangay New San Juan, Cabangan, Zambales, received the first Philippine's first Certificate of Ancestral Domain Claim (CADC) on March 8, 1996. The CADT was acquired 16 years later in December 2010.[24]
On May 31, 2022, 848 Aeta families belonging to the Ayta Mag-indi and Ayta Mag-antsi groups were issued their CADT by the NCIP, after the title was approved in 2009. The CADT covers the Pampanga towns of Camias, Diaz, Inararo, Villa Maria and Sapang Uwak in Porac; Sapang Bato in Angeles City; and parts of Floridablanca. The CADT also includes San Marcelino town in Zambales.[25]
Dumagat-Remontado communities inhabit the Sierra Madre mountain range in Rizal and Quezon.[26][27] Their ancestral domain claims cover parts of the Sierra Madre mountain range.[28][29] A CADT was issued to Dumagat families in Gabaldon town, Nueva Ecija, in December 2021.[25]
Nevertheless, Aeta communities face difficulties in getting ancestral domain titles. Aetas of Tarlac, for example, have failed to get titles for 18,000 hectares of land in Capas despite applications for CADT filed in 1999, 2014, and 2019.[30]
Lifestyle
The Aeta are nomadic and build only temporary shelters made of sticks driven to the ground and covered with the palm of banana leaves. The more modernized Aetas have moved to villages and areas of cleared mountains. They live in houses made of bamboo and cogon grass.
Mining, deforestation, illegal logging, and slash-and-burn farming have caused the indigenous population in the country to steadily decrease to the point where they number only in the thousands today. The Philippine government affords them little or no protection, and the Aeta have become extremely nomadic due to social and economic strain on their culture and way of life that had previously remained unchanged for thousands of years.
As hunter-gatherers, adaptation plays an important role in Aeta communities to survive. This often includes gaining knowledge about the tropical forest that they live in, the typhoon cycles that travel through their area, and other seasonal weather changes that affect the behavior of the flora and fauna in their location.[31] Another important survival skill is storytelling. Like many other hunter-gatherer societies, the Aeta promote social values, such as cooperation, through stories. Thus, they highly value skilled storytellers.[32]
Dry season for many Aeta communities means intense work. They not only hunt and fish more, the start of the dry season also means swiddening the land for future harvest. While the clearing of land is done by both men and women, Aeta women tend to do most of the harvesting. During this period, they also do business transactions with non-Aeta communities living around the vicinity they temporarily settled in either to sell the food they gathered, or to work as temporary farmers or field laborers. Aeta women play more active roles in business transactions with non-Aeta communities, mostly as traders and agricultural workers for lowland farmers.[33] While dry season typically means bountiful food for Aetas, rainy season (which often falls in the Philippines between September and December) often provides the opposite experience, considering the difficulties of traversing flooded and wet forests for hunting and gathering.
Aeta communities use different tools in their hunting and gathering activities. Traditional tools include traps, knives, and bow and arrow, with different types of arrow points for specialized purposes.[9] Most Aetas are trained for hunting and gathering at age 15, including Aeta women. While men and some women typically use the standard bow and arrow, most Aeta women prefer knives and often hunt with their dogs and in groups to increase efficiency and for social reasons.[34] Fishing and food gathering are also done by both males and females. In terms of gender, then, Aeta communities are more egalitarian in structure and in practice.
Language
All Aeta communities have adopted the language of their Austronesian Filipino neighbors, which have sometimes diverged over time to become different languages.[35] These include, in order of number of speakers, Mag-indi, Mag-antsi, Abellen, Ambala, and Mariveleño. The second languages they speak are Kapampangan, Ilocano, and Tagalog; Kapampangan in Central Luzon, Ilocano in Cagayan Valley and northern areas of Central Luzon, and Tagalog in Central Luzon, Southern Tagalog, and other areas of Luzon.
Religion
Indigenous monotheistic religion
There are different views on the dominant character of the Aeta religion. Those who believe they are monotheistic argue that various Aeta tribes believe in a supreme being who rules over lesser spirits or deities, with the Aeta of Mt. Pinatubo worshipping "Apo Na". The Aetas are also animists. For example, the Pinatubo Aeta believe in environmental spirits. They believe that good and evil spirits inhabit the environment, such as the spirits of the river, sea, sky, mountain, hill, valley and other places. Kamana the forest spirit appears and disappears providing solace and hope during difficult times.[citation needed]
No special occasion is needed for the Aeta to pray, but there is a clear link between prayer and economic activities. The Aeta dance before and after a pig hunt. The night before Aeta women gather shellfish, they perform a dance which is partly an apology to the fish and partly a charm to ensure the catch. Similarly, the men hold a bee dance before and after the expeditions for honey.
Indigenous polytheistic religion
There are four manifestations of the "great creator" who rules the world: Tigbalog is the source of life and action; Lueve takes care of production and growth; Amas moves people to pity, love, unity, and peace of heart; while Binangewan is responsible for change, sickness, and death.
- Gutugutumakkan – The Supreme Being and Great Creator who have four manifestations, namely, Tigbalog, Lueve, Amas, and Binangewan.
- Kedes – The god of the hunt.
- Pawi – The god of the forest.
- Sedsed – The god of the sea.
Christianity
In the mid-1960s, missionaries of the American-based Evangelical Protestant mission group New Tribes Mission, in their effort to reach every Philippine tribal group with the Christian Gospel, reached out to the Agtas/Aetas. The mission agency provided education, including pastoral training for natives to reach members of their own tribe. Today, a large percentage of Agtas/Aetas of Zambales and Pampanga are Evangelicals. Jehovah's Witnesses also have members among the Aeta people. (See 1993 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses)
Clothing
Their traditional clothing is very plain. The young women wear wrap around skirts. Elder women wear bark cloth, while elder men wear loin cloths. The old women of the Agta wear a bark cloth strip which passes between the legs, and is attached to a string around the waist. Today, most Aeta who have been in contact with lowlanders have adopted the T-shirts, pants and rubber sandals commonly used by the latter.
Practices
The Aetas are skillful in weaving and plaiting. Women exclusively weave winnows and mats. Only men make armlets. They also produce raincoats made of palm leaves whose bases surround the neck of the wearer, and whose topmost part spreads like a fan all around the body.
According to one study, "About 85% of Philippine Aeta women hunt, and they hunt the same quarry as men. Aeta women hunt in groups and with dogs, and have a 31% success rate as opposed to 17% for men. Their rates are even better when they combine forces with men: mixed hunting groups have a full 41% success rate among the Aeta."[36]
Medicine
Aeta women are known around the country as experts of the herbal medicines.
Among the Aeta community in Ilagan, Isabela for example, banana leaves are used to cure toothache. They also bathe themselves with cooled-down water boiled with camphor leaves (subusob) to help alleviate fever, or they make herbal teas out of the camphor leaves that they then drink thrice a day if the fever and cold still persist. For muscle pains, they drink herbal teas extracted from kalulong leaves and have the patient take it thrice a day. In order to prevent relapse after giving birth, women also bathe themselves in cooled-down water boiled with sahagubit roots. The drinking of sahagubit herbal tea is likewise recommended to deworm Aeta children, or generally to alleviate stomachache. For birth control purposes, Aeta women drink wine made out of lukban (pomelo) root. They are, however, not advised to drink herbal tea from makahiya extract even if it's also used to elevate stomachache problems due to the belief that it will cause abortion. The idea behind this is that like the closing of makahiya leaves once touched, the womb may also close once the makahiya touches it. The Aeta in Isabela also recommend drinking herbal tea out of wormwood (herbaca) leaves or stem to address women's irregular menstrual cycle. They take herbal teas from lemon grass (barbaraniw) extract thrice a day to normalize blood pressure.[37]
If the illness persists even after continuous drinking of recommended herbal medicine, that's when they seek the help of an herbolario (or soothsayer). They do so because the Aeta believe that their illnesses are caused by a spirit that they may have offended, in which case herbal medicines or medical doctors won't be able to address. In order to appease the spirits, they ask the herbolario to perform a ritual called ud- udung. In this ritual, the herbolario places rice or raw eggs on the patient's forehead first to determine what causes the illness and repeats this several times to confirm. After the herbolario is satisfied, the patient will be asked to bathe with ricewash, and then to offer food to appease the offended spirit.[38]
The Aeta communities take pride in their use of herbal medicines and their own natural ways of curing the sick. Finding their main source of herbal medicines in their habitat rather than buying costly medicines, emphasizing the mutual relationship with the nature, also has a great attitudinal impact pertaining to sustainability approach and practices in healthcare.[38]
Art
A traditional form of visual art is body scarification. The Aetas intentionally wound the skin on their back, arms, breast, legs, hands, calves and abdomen, and then they irritate the wounds with fire, lime and other means to form scars.
Other "decorative disfigurements" include the chipping of the teeth. With the use of a file, the Dumagat modify their teeth during late puberty. The teeth are dyed black a few years afterwards.
The Aetas generally use ornaments typical of people living in subsistence economies. Flowers and leaves are used as earplugs for certain occasions. Girdles, necklaces, and neckbands of braided rattan incorporated with wild pig bristles are frequently worn.
Music
The Aeta have a musical heritage consisting of various types of agung ensembles, ensembles composed of large hanging, suspended or held, bossed/knobbed gongs, which act as drone, without any accompanying melodic instrument.
Traditional political organization
While the father is normally the figurehead of the family, Aeta communities or bands traditionally had an anarchic political structure wherein they don't have appointed chiefs to exercise authority over them. Individual Aeta is on equal grounds with the other and their main course of social interaction is through their tradition. It's also the tradition, and not constituted laws, that maintain the equality among them and guide their way of life. They do have groups of elders in their community, called pisen, who they tend to go to when it comes to arbitrating decisions. However, the decisions made by the elders only remain in advisory capacity and no one could force any individual to follow those decisions. Their guiding principle and conflict resolution is through a sustained deliberation.[39]
Over time, this egalitarian political structure was disturbed due to recurring contacts with the lowland Filipinos wherein the local officials and individuals they interact with forced Aeta communities to create government structure resembling those in the lowlands. At times, Aeta communities do organize themselves in government-like system with a Capitan (Captain), Conseyal (Council) and Policia (Police). But mostly, they resist such imposed organization. In particular, they refuse to appoint a chief (or a president) that will govern them although they do have one elder that takes the responsibility of leadership. This informal kind of government can also be found in their judicial process. When someone in their community did something wrong, they would deliberate about it, but more importantly, they do not talk about what kind of punishment they will hand to the wrong-doer. Instead, the deliberation is about understanding the motivation behind the action and prevent the consequence of the action from developing into something worse. Young men and women are excluded from the deliberation process. In this particular case, women are also largely excluded from the deliberation process even when they are allowed to attend the hearing or even when sometimes they can make their opinion about the problem. For the most part, women are not given room within the decision making process because the Aeta communities also follow a strict gender role where women are mostly expected take care of the children and the husband.[39]
See also
References
- Media related to Aeta people at Wikimedia Commons
- ^ a b "2010 Census of Population and Housing, Report No. 2A: Demographic and Housing Characteristics (Non-Sample Variables) - Philippines" (PDF). Philippine Statistics Authority. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 7, 2020. Retrieved May 19, 2020.
- ^ "The Aeta". peoplesoftheworld.org. Archived from the original on February 26, 2012. Retrieved June 16, 2012.
- ^ a b Larena, Maximilian; McKenna, James; Sanchez-Quinto, Federico (2021). "Philippine Ayta possess the highest level of Denisovan ancestry in the world". Current Biology. 31 (19): 4219–4230. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.022. PMC 8596304. PMID 34388371.
- ^ a b c Reid, Lawrence A. (1987). "The Early Switch Hypothesis: Linguistic Evidence for Contact between Negritos and Austronesians" (PDF). Man and Culture in Oceania. 3 Special Issue: 41–59. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 10, 2021. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
- ^ Allingham, R. Rand (December 2008). "Assessment of Visual Status of the Aeta, a Hunter-Gatherer Population of the Philippines (An AOS Thesis)". Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society. 106: 240–251. ISSN 0065-9533. PMC 2646443. PMID 19277240.
- ^ a b c d e f g Reid, Lawrence A. (2013). "Who Are the Philippine Negritos? Evidence from Language". Human Biology. 85 (1): 329–58. doi:10.3378/027.085.0316. PMID 24297232. S2CID 8341240. Archived from the original on March 5, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
- ^ Balilla, Vincent S.; Anwar McHenry, Julia; McHenry, Mark P.; Parkinson, Riva Marris; Banal, Danilo T. (2013). "Indigenous Aeta Magbukún Self-Identity, Sociopolitical Structures, and Self-Determination at the Local Level in the Philippines". Journal of Anthropology. 2013: 1–6. doi:10.1155/2013/391878. ISSN 2090-4045.
- ^ Rai, Navin K (1989). From forest to field: a study of Philippine Negrito foragers in transition (Thesis). Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms. OCLC 416933818.
- ^ a b Griffin, P. Bion (2001). "A Small Exhibit on the Agta and Their Future". American Anthropologist. 103 (2): 515–518. doi:10.1525/aa.2001.103.2.515. ISSN 1548-1433.
- ^ a b Himes, Ronald S. (2002). "The Relationship of Umiray Dumaget to Other Philippine Languages". Oceanic Linguistics. 41 (2): 275–294. doi:10.2307/3623311. JSTOR 3623311.
- ^ Thomas N. Headland; John D. Early (March 1, 1998). Population Dynamics of a Philippine Rain Forest People: The San Ildefonso Agta. University Press of Florida. p. 208. ISBN 9780813015552. Archived from the original on August 16, 2021. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
- ^ a b McHenry, Mark P.; Anwar-McHenry, Julia; Balilla, Vincent S.; Parkinson, Riva Marris (November 2013). "The Indigenous Aetas of Bataan, Philippines: Extraordinary genetic origins, modern history and land rights: Indigenous Aetas of Bataan origins and rights". Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography. 34 (3): 292–306. doi:10.1111/sjtg.12038. hdl:20.500.11937/44601. Archived from the original on November 28, 2020. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
- ^ Jinam; et al. (August 8, 2017). "Discerning the Origins of the Negritos, First Sundaland People: Deep Divergence and Archaic Admixture". Genome Biology and Evolution. 9 (8): 2013–2022. doi:10.1093/gbe/evx118. PMC 5597900. PMID 28854687. Retrieved March 1, 2023.
- ^ a b c Jinam, Timothy A.; Phipps, Maude E.; Aghakhanian, Farhang; Majumder, Partha P.; Datar, Francisco; Stoneking, Mark; Sawai, Hiromi; Nishida, Nao; Tokunaga, Katsushi; Kawamura, Shoji; Omoto, Keiichi; Saitou, Naruya (August 2017). "Discerning the Origins of the Negritos, First Sundaland People: Deep Divergence and Archaic Admixture". Genome Biology and Evolution. 9 (8): 2013–2022. doi:10.1093/gbe/evx118. PMC 5597900. PMID 28854687.
- ^ a b Larena, Maximilian; Sanchez-Quinto, Federico; Sjödin, Per; McKenna, James; Ebeo, Carlo; Reyes, Rebecca; Casel, Ophelia; Huang, Jin-Yuan; Hagada, Kim Pullupul; Guilay, Dennis; Reyes, Jennelyn; Allian, Fatima Pir; Mori, Virgilio; Azarcon, Lahaina Sue; Manera, Alma (March 30, 2021). "Multiple migrations to the Philippines during the last 50,000 years". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 118 (13): e2026132118. Bibcode:2021PNAS..11826132L. doi:10.1073/pnas.2026132118. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 8020671. PMID 33753512.
- ^ "Discerning the Origins of the Negritos, First Sundaland People: Deep Divergence and Archaic Admixture". academic.oup.com. August 8, 2017. Retrieved February 27, 2023.
- ^ Bulbeck, David (November 27, 2013). "Craniodental Affinities of Southeast Asia's "Negritos" and the Concordance with Their Genetic Affinities". Human Biology. 85 (1). ISSN 0018-7143.
- ^ Lipson M, Loh PR, Patterson N, Moorjani P, Ko YC, Stoneking M, et al. (August 2014). "Reconstructing Austronesian population history in Island Southeast Asia" (PDF). Nature Communications. 5 (1): 4689. Bibcode:2014NatCo...5.4689L. doi:10.1038/ncomms5689. PMC 4143916. PMID 25137359. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 21, 2019. Retrieved January 21, 2019.
- ^ Scott, William (1994). Barangay. Manila, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila. pp. 252–256.
- ^ Country Technical Notes on Indigenous Peoples' Issues: Republic of the Philippines. International Fund For Agricultural Development. November 2012. Archived from the original on August 16, 2021. Retrieved May 29, 2020.
- ^ Teves, Ma Althea (May 31, 2009). "First clean ancestral domain title for Aetas awarded". ABS-CBN News. Archived from the original on June 29, 2018. Retrieved May 29, 2020.
- ^ "Aetas get 15,860 hectares of ancestral lands on Mount Pinatubo". CPCA Brisbane. January 14, 2010. Archived from the original on March 21, 2015. Retrieved December 3, 2020.
- ^ Drewery, Emmanuel (January 20, 2010). "Ancestral Land Domain Title Awarded At Last! by Emmanuel Drewery". CPCA Brisbane. Archived from the original on March 21, 2015. Retrieved December 3, 2020.
- ^ "Explore Case Studies: Maalagay Dogal/Matilo, Philippines". ICCA Registry. March 2013. Archived from the original on August 5, 2020. Retrieved May 29, 2020.
- ^ a b "After 13 years, Pampanga Aetas get title to ancestral domain". Philippine Daily Inquirer. June 1, 2022. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
- ^ "The Remontados of the Sierra Madre Mountains". National Commission for Culture and the Arts. Archived from the original on March 4, 2021. Retrieved June 11, 2021.
- ^ Madarang, Catalina Ricci S. (November 19, 2020). "Calls to preserve Sierra Madre mountain range renewed after 'Ulysses' onslaught". Interaksyon. Archived from the original on June 11, 2021. Retrieved June 11, 2021.
- ^ Chavez, Leilani (November 5, 2019). "A Philippine tribe that defeated a dam prepares to fight its reincarnation". Mongabay Environmental News. Archived from the original on June 15, 2021. Retrieved June 11, 2021.
- ^ Valdez, Euden (April 10, 2021). "Antipolo Dumagats hope new 31,000-tree reforestation project takes root". Philstar. Archived from the original on April 10, 2021. Retrieved June 11, 2021.
- ^ Torregoza, Hannah (December 11, 2019). "Hontiveros seeks Senate probe into alleged displacement of Aeta in New Clark City". Manila Bulletin. Archived from the original on August 16, 2021. Retrieved December 3, 2020.
- ^ Griffin, P.; Bion Griffin, Agnes Estioko (1985). The Agta of northeastern Luzon : recent studies. University of San Carlos. OCLC 760167711.
- ^ Smith, Daniel; Schlaepfer, Philip; Major, Katie; Dyble, Mark; Page, Abigail E.; Thompson, James; et al. (December 5, 2017). "Cooperation and the evolution of hunter-gatherer storytelling". Nature Communications. 8 (1): 1853. Bibcode:2017NatCo...8.1853S. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02036-8. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 5717173. PMID 29208949.
- ^ "Agta Forager Women in the Philippines". www.culturalsurvival.org. Archived from the original on November 15, 2019. Retrieved November 10, 2019.
- ^ Goodman, Madeleine J.; Griffin, P. Bion; Estioko-Griffin, Agnes A.; Grove, John S. (June 1985). "The compatibility of hunting and mothering among the agta hunter-gatherers of the Philippines". Sex Roles. 12 (11–12): 1199–1209. doi:10.1007/bf00287829. ISSN 0360-0025. S2CID 144311017.
- ^ Reid, Lawrence. 1987. "The early switch hypothesis". Man and Culture in Oceania, 3 Special Issue: 41-59.
- ^ Dahlberg, Frances (1975). Woman the Gatherer. London: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-02989-6. Archived from the original on April 16, 2021. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
- ^ Mijares, Sharon G. (September 11, 2015). Modern psychology and ancient wisdom : psychological healing practices from the world's religious traditions (Second ed.). New York. ISBN 9781138884502. OCLC 904506046.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ a b Mijares, Sharon Grace (September 11, 2015). Modern psychology and ancient wisdom : psychological healing practices from the world's religious traditions. Routledge. ISBN 978-1138884502. OCLC 1048748475.
- ^ a b Noval-Morales, Daisy; Monan, James (1979). A Primer on The Negrito of The Philippines. Manila, Philippines: Philippine Business for Social Progress.
Further reading
- Gaillard, Jean-Christophe (December 2006). "Was it a cultural disaster? Aeta resilience following the 1991 Mt Pinatubo eruption". Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society. 34 (4): 376–399. JSTOR 29792602.